It just seems that “guilty until proven innocent” is a sleazy approach to the problem. There are many libraries that will enter your music into youtube contentID without asking you and without letting you know what you might have earned.
![yt music key yt music key](https://64.media.tumblr.com/6e4a1761741071e980326a88626672b0/4ebe1bd55dd6f0f4-a7/s400x600/287884b526c81c09edf84b312e4973fe61b36163.gif)
I’ve been cautious to NOT enter into any agreements authorizing YouTube Content ID. They’ve always been a decent company to deal with. If you feel like posting the info on your false claims from AdRev I can help you figure that out.ĬontentID posts lots of info now on the copyright claims (usually) and there are lots of ways to use that info to figure out what is happening and who to contact. Your AdShare claims will all come down when Lee puts his request through. I’m not sure the 2 companies aren’t related. This is exactly why it is good for composers to test their catalogs on youtube for false copyright claims like this.ĪdShare & AdRev. They blame it on an intern or something that keeps reinstating these composer’s music catalogs into youtube contentID but why is it even an option for an intern to be able to do this when they have confirmed over and over again that the music from these composers has been deleted from the database. AdShare MG is apparently just lying to everybody when they confirm a composer’s music is removed. They keep saying they have removed that music from the youtube contentID database but they obviously haven’t as many of the composers who were around at that time keep getting their music reinstated with AdShare MG. Many of the catalogs that were inadvertently uploaded to AdShare MG are somehow getting re-claimed on youtube. What you posted it actually looks like AdShare MG was making the claim on your music.ĭid you have your music in the AS library around 2011?